| |
ELECTRICITY
ACT 1989
ELECTRICITY
(APPLICATIONS FOR CONSENT) REGULATIONS 1990
THE ELECTRICITY WORKS (ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT)
(SCOTLAND)
REGULATIONS 2000
PROPOSED GORDONBUSH WIND FARM
Further
to Landscape's formal objection to the above proposal, dated 13 October
2003, I now write to comment on the Supplementary Information provided
by SSE Generation Limited to the original Environmental Statement submitted
in June 2003.
It is surprising, and disappointing, that the Developers have not taken
the opportunity to clarify any of the important traffic and access issues
outlined in my letter of 13 October, which remain of great concern to
local residents and all those living to the north of Brora dependent on
the A9 trunk road.
A detailed response to the section on ornithology is attached at Annex
1. The new ornithological data and assessments do not provide the
necessary assurances that there would be no more than an 'acceptable'
level of damage or disturbance to either the scheduled bird species on
the proposed wind farm site itself, or those (and other) species on the
adjacent SPA/Ramsar site. In more than one instance the need for further
research to more accurately gauge the likely effects of the proposed development
is recognised. Why, then, has the Application been resubmitted before
this essential work has been carried out?
In the context of ornithology, I would draw your attention to two relevant
European cases (in Germany and Greece - see Annex
2) which have come to Landscape's notice since the original application
was submitted. The first, in which the German Government has been asked
to explain the need for a threat to important bird populations on and
outwith an adjacent SPA, has many parallels with the Gordonbush situation.
The second provides a long-awaited determination by the European Court
of Justice that the term 'deliberate' in the EC Habitats Directive (and,
by inference, the Birds Directive) includes the making of a planning decision
in the knowledge that death, damage or disturbance would be likely to
occur as a result of that decision. This has legal ramifications for both
the Scottish Executive and Regional Councils where planning permission
is being considered for developments affecting EC priority habitats and
scheduled species.
Thanks to the help of local archaeologists from the Clyne Heritage Society,
the section on archaeology now provides a much better illustration of
the value of this site in a local and Scottish historical context. So
much of this information is new that an assessment of its true value demands
further investigation and analysis.
The Developers' contradiction of SNH's comments on wild land would be
comical if, sadly, it did not demonstrate their complete lack of feeling
for the natural environment. There are a number of places in the East
Sutherland hills where there is no obvious visible evidence of human agency.
This provides an experience which is very hard to evaluate in any conventional
way. The 'wild land' concept developed by SNH applies to larger landscapes
where such purity would be harder to achieve, but the presence of an intrusive
development clearly visible from an area of wild land would completely
negate the objective. This is no doubt why SNH selected vantage points
within the wild land area to assess the visual impact of the wind farm.
For the Developers to argue that adjacent wild land could still be viewed
untarnished from the development is ludicrous.
I note that a copy of this letter and attachments will be sent by you
to the Highland Council In view of the proximity of the proposed wind
farm site to internationally important bird areas, its negative impact
on an EC 'priority habitat' and the recent European casework referred
to above, I am sending a copy to the Environment Directorate of the European
Commission. They should be aware of this totally unnecessary threat to
a number of scheduled species within a priority habitat, given that wind
farm applications in Scotland already far exceed the number needed to
meet renewable energy targets from this sector.
|